Showing posts with label Gay Marriage. Show all posts

Happy New Year!

As the title says: Happy New Year!  I had a great time on Sunday/Monday hanging out with other Springfield seminarians.  They are a bunch of absolutely top-notch guys and an absolute blast to spend time with.  As usual, we stayed that the Villa Maria, which is a retreat center that the diocese owns right off of lake Springfield.  Everyone arrived around 3PM on Sunday and we spent some time mostly chatting until around 4 when some priests from the diocese arrived.  The Christmas gathering is our chance to not only hang out as seminarians but also to get to know some of the priests of the diocese (which I did).  We had evening prayer at 4:30, followed by some snacks (more chatting), and then dinner (which was composed of salad, rolls, roast beef, shepherds pie [really good!], mashed potatoes, and cheesecake).  There are two new guys who are entering Brute this coming up semester, which is fantastic (they are also brothers, which is even cooler), and I had the chance to talk with them some over dinner.  After dinner most of the priests took off, though we still had a good time joking, chatting, and (I'm running out of words to describe spending time together...) hanging out.  It was a wonderful time, and I stayed up almost until midnight talking with the other guys.  The next morning we had Mass at 8:00, followed by breakfast, and then a talk by the bishop.  He touched on many of the topics that often come up these days - gay marriage, Pope Francis, the new evangelization - all things we need to be aware of and knowledgeable about.  Many of the guys chimed in with their ideas on each topic and it turned into a really good conversation.  Then we had lunch and then everybody drove off their separate ways.  And that, at least very summarized, was the Christmas get-together!  (I also had some good chances to pray.  There is a chapel at the villa, and for whatever reason, I often pray really well in a place that is different than usual.)

I raced back to Quincy that afternoon and got back in time to go over to St. Rose for a serving practice.  Unexpectedly (at least to me), the Bishop (along with the Quincy deanery) decided to turn St. Rose into a parish, and so we had to figure out how to do a pontifical Mass.  St. Rose is staffed by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter, who's charism is to provide the faithful with the Extraordinary Form of the Mass, and so, Mass with a bishop is rather complicated and different than the typical high-Mass that we have each Sunday.  Two summers ago the Bishop celebrated Mass at St. Rose, but that also included the consecration of the altars, confirmation, and a Corpus Christi procession, so it was way more complicated than the Mass he said today.  (I have the video of that liturgy in 2012 on YouTube if you want to see what it was like...)  Anyway, practice lasted nearly 2 hours because we kept trying to hash out how different things would happen.  The sanctuary gets pretty cramped when you throw a Bishop, Deacon, Sub-deacon, and a dozen servers up there, so it took pretty long to figure out exactly what each person would have to do, and where they could fit.  

That evening my brother, a friend from church, and myself went out for pizza and some bowling.  We had a good evening - the pizza was great (pizza buffet = wonderful), and bowling was fun (though none of us even broke 100 in a single game...), and all-in-all it was a good time.  We goofed off a bit, trying different crazy methods to roll the ball down the lane - sliding, sideways, backwards, two hands, no hands, heavy, light...  We tried them all!  I just wish my Wii bowling skills would transfer into real life!  

On Tuesday I spent the morning running around knocking things off my to-do list.  First it was the eye-doctor, then the bank, then the doctor to get my immunization updated (yay!), and then it was off to noon Mass at St. Rose.  After Mass I met up with Corey Bruns, a fellow seminarian from Brute who was born in Quincy (and has family here), but is now a seminarian from Owensboro KY, and we went to Maid-Rites for lunch.  It was actually Corey's idea, but I was glad to get the chance to go there anyway.  (Besides, how do you beat a maid-rite and chocolate shake for lunch?)  We had a good time just chatting about how our breaks had been.  Apparently, Corey's was, if this is even possible, more hectic and busy than mine!

I actually don't remember what I did Tuesday afternoon - I was busy, but with what?

And that folks, will have to be all for now.  It is almost midnight, and despite my intention to write about Mass today, I do want to get some sleep!  I sincerely hope to get that written tomorrow or the next day!  (But whenever I say that something always seems to come up...)  

Say a prayer for all us seminarians to Mary Mother of God - she must be an exemplar to us all, and certainly is a mother to us all!  Think about how amazing it is that God has a human mother - just crazy!  May I recommend entrusting 2014 to her care!




Pope Francis - Person of the Year!

As you probably have heard, Pope Francis was just named Time Magazine's Person of the Year.  He receives the title which had also given to Blessed Pope John Paul II and John XXIII, (who will both be canonized in April).  I read the article, Pope Francis, The People's Pope, and I was a bit worried when I saw the opening line: "He took the name of a humble saint and then called for a church of healing. The first non-European pope in 1,200 years is poised to transform a place that measures change by the century".  Great... Another article about how Pope Francis is going to change everything about the Catholic Church and switch its teaching on abortion, gay marriage, etc.  Wonderful, another news piece that doesn't understand that the Church can't change these teaching because they are Divinely, not humanly, mandated.  They quickly realized my fears:

The papacy is mysterious and magical: it turns a septuagenarian into a superstar while revealing almost nothing about the man himself. And it raises hopes in every corner of the world—hopes that can never be fulfilled, for they are irreconcilable. The elderly traditionalist who pines for the old Latin Mass and the devout young woman who wishes she could be a priest both have hopes. The ambitious monsignor in the Vatican Curia and the evangelizing deacon in a remote Filipino village both have hopes. No Pope can make them all happy at once.

Here it comes, thought I...  But then they got it right:

And so Francis signals great change while giving the same answers to the uncomfortable questions. On the question of female priests: “We need to work harder to develop a profound theology of the woman.” Which means: no. No to abortion, because an individual life begins at conception. No to gay marriage, because the male-female bond is established by God. “The teaching of the church … is clear,” he has said, “and I am a son of the church, but”—and here he adds his prayer for himself—“it is not necessary to talk about those issues all the time.”

Again, later in the article:


The five words that have come to define both the promise and the limits of Francis’ papacy came in the form of a question: “Who am I to judge?” That was his answer when asked about homo­sexuality by a reporter in July. Many assumed Francis, with those words, was changing church doctrine. Instead, he was merely changing its tone, searching for a pragmatic path to reach the faithful who had been repelled by their church or its emphasis on strict dos and don’ts. Years of working closely with parish priests have taught him that the church seemed more comfortable with narrow issues than human complexity, and it lost congregants and credibility in the bargain. He is urging his army to think more broadly.

I was legitimately surprised!  Of course, the article isn't perfect, I could complain about some points (even in these quotations), but I'm not going to.  I think they did a really good job outlining the man who is now Pope.  The author seems to understand what the Pope is saying, knowing the background that is the 2000 years of Church Tradition.  I am just glad to see something that finally sets the record pretty straight.  Hopefully, this article will allow people to see the true depth behind Pope Francis.  He isn't changing doctrine, and his change in tone isn't because he is liberal.  Church teaching isn't liberal or conservative, it's truth.  Pope Francis, by putting a huge emphasis on love, compassion, charity, solidarity, etc. isn't undermining Church teaching, He is showing the world the beauty, goodness, and truth behind the morality that they all-too-often misunderstand as harsh, bureaucratic, rules. 

Thanks Time magazine for the great article!  Thanks Pope Francis for setting an example for the world!

Wow, I haven't written a blog post like that before.  (Let me know if it didn't make sense or if I said anything crazy - I hate it when that happens...)  I only have the metaphysics final tomorrow and a bit of polishing to do on the senior seminar paper!

Bishop Paprocki's Homily on Same-Sex Marriage

Today my state of Illinois became the 16th state to legalize same sex marriage.  Below is the homily given by my bishop.  Read it!  He forcefully and charitably (yes, those adjectives can go together) explains the Church's teaching on the matter, and offers prayers for those who support this evil.  Trust me, it is an absolutely phenomenal homily!  Keep prayers going up for all our bishops, standing up for the truth is hard.


Homily for Prayers of Supplication and Exorcism in Reparation for the Sin of Same-Sex Marriage 
November 20, 2013
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception
Springfield, Illinois
Most Reverend Thomas John Paprocki
Bishop of Springfield in Illinois




My dear brothers and sisters in Christ,
We are gathered here today in the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception for a special Holy Hour before the Real Presence of Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament to participate in “Prayers of Supplication and Exorcism in Reparation for the Sin of Same-Sex Marriage.” I wish to preface my reflections by saying that I am conducting this prayer service and am speaking to you now with great reluctance. I did not seek to enter any controversy and I don’t relish being part of one. But I have given this matter a great deal of thought and prayer, which has led me to the conviction that God is calling me to speak out and conduct these prayers.

In our prayers, we must be open to hear where God is leading us and to embrace the path that He offers. That is a much different starting point than beginning with our own wants, desires, and conclusions. That is why we pray every day, “Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.”


Our prayers at this time are prompted by the fact that the Governor of Illinois today is signing into Illinois law the redefinition of civil marriage, introducing not only an unprecedented novelty into our state law, but also institutionalizing an objectively sinful reality.


 It is not hateful to say that an immoral action is sinful. On the contrary, the most compassionate thing we can do is help people to turn away from sin. To ignore another person’s wrongful actions is a sign of apathy or indifference, while fraternal correction is motivated by love for that person’s well-being, as can be seen by the fact that our Lord Jesus himself urged such correction.1 Indeed, the call to repentance is at the heart of the Gospel, as Jesus proclaimed, “The Kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe the Good News”(Mark 1:15). 

The Good News is that God’s mercy and forgiveness extend to those who repent. Mercy does not mean approving of something that is sinful, but does absolve the wrongdoer after a change of heart takes place in the sinner through the gift of God’s grace. It is not the Church that must change to conform its teachings to the views of the world, but it is each individual who is called to be configured to Christ.

As we heard in the Gospel passage that was just read, Jesus tells His disciples, “Go into the whole world and proclaim the Good News to all creation. . . . Signs like these will accompany those who have professed their faith: they will use my name to expel demons” (Mark 16:15-17). Thus it is through the power of Jesus that evil is displaced from our hearts and is replaced by divine love. This change of heart involves a spiritual battle that is not easily won, but in which we receive the assistance of angels, under the leadership of Saint Michael the Archangel (cf. Daniel 12:1-3). We need not fear this battle, for Christ has conquered sin and death, and in Christ rests our hope of final victory.

As such, I do not stand here before you as a self-righteous saint who has achieved spiritual perfection, but as a sinner who has received Jesus into his heart as his Lord and Savior. To acknowledge one’s sinfulness is indeed the starting point of what it means to be a Christian. However, our Christian identity does not end with this admission of sin, but finds its salvation in accepting the saving grace of our Most Holy Redeemer, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who died on the cross to forgive our sins and rose from the dead to lead us to the reward of eternal life in His Kingdom. Our second reading from Saint Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians affirms this: “It is in Christ and through His blood that we have been redeemed and our sins forgiven, so immeasurably generous is God’s favor to us” (Ephesians 1:7).

Pope Francis expressed this essential message in his recent interview published in various Jesuits publications in these words: “The most important thing is the first proclamation: Jesus Christ has saved you. And the ministers of the church must be ministers of mercy above all. The confessor, for example, is always in danger of being either too much of a rigorist or too lax. Neither is merciful, because neither of them really takes responsibility for the person. The rigorist washes his hands so that he leaves it to the commandment. The loose minister washes his hands by simply saying, ‘This is not a sin’ or something like that. In pastoral ministry we must accompany people, and we must heal their wounds.”2 

This is a key point which the secularists are missing: they think that stressing God’s mercy means that sins are no longer sins. On the contrary, God’s mercy is a great gift of grace precisely because sins are sins and they call for repentance and forgiveness. 

Note from the interview, when he was asked to describe himself, Pope Francis said simply, “I am a sinner.” After a brief pause, he amplifies this self-identity in the understanding of a Christian who has been saved by Christ, saying, “I am a sinner whom the Lord has looked upon.”3 

This is not the first time that I have offered prayers of repentance here in our Cathedral. On December 12, 2011, I offered a service of “Repentance and Prayer for those Harmed in the Church,” at which I said, “I express repentance for the sins of the members of the Church who have harmed others. Sometimes these harms were evil in themselves, such as the sins of racism and the sexual abuse of minors, as well as other forms of unchastity. At other times, the harms may have been done in the context of actions that were in themselves not sinful and may even have been necessary for pastoral or economic reasons, such as the closing of a church or school, but nevertheless were done in a way that was insensitive to the feelings of those who would be affected. Therefore we pray for all those who have been harmed.” This prayer service was modeled along the lines of Pope John Paul II's “Day of Pardon” held on the First Sunday of Lent, March 12, 2000, as part of the observation of the Great Jubilee of the new millennium, in which Pope John Paul II said that the Church “should kneel before God and implore forgiveness for the past and present sins of her sons and daughters.”

While prayers of supplication in reparation for sin may be easily understood as our pleas and entreaties to God for forgiveness of sins and deliverance from temptation, the meaning of the term “exorcism” in the title of this prayer service is not so readily apparent and requires some explanation. Indeed, some have ridiculed our Church’s use of this ancient religious practice.4 We must remember the encouragement of Pope Saint Leo the Great, who said over 1,500 years ago, “The Church is not diminished by persecutions, but rather increased.”5 It should also be noted that the bill that the Governor is signing today is called the “Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act,” which purportedly provides that “the Act does not interfere with any religious beliefs about marriage.”6 

Perhaps a large part of the negative reaction is because most people don’t know what the Church teaches about exorcism, since they get their misleading information and sensational ideas on this mainly from Hollywood. The fact is that a “minor exorcism” takes place in every Baptism and Confirmation ceremony when we renounce Satan and all his works and empty promises. This prayer service will be along those lines. I’m not saying that anyone involved in the redefinition of marriage is possessed by the devil, which, if that were the case, would require the remedy of a “Major Exorcism,” but all of us are certainly subject to the devil’s evil influences and in need of protection and deliverance from evil.  


Our prayer service today and my words are not meant to demonize anyone, but are intended to call attention to the diabolical influences of the devil that have penetrated our culture, both in the state and in the Church. These demonic influences are not readily apparent to the undiscerning eye, which is why they are so deceptive. A helpful resource in this regard is a recent book by Father Louis J. Cameli, a priest of the Archdiocese of Chicago, called The Devil You Don’t Know: Recognizing and Resisting Evil in Everyday Life. While the popular tendency may be to identify the devil only with his extraordinary activity, which is diabolical possession, Father Cameli writes about the ordinary work of the devil: deception, division, diversion and discouragement.7


The deception of the Devil in same-sex marriage may be understood by recalling the words of Pope Francis when he faced a similar situation as Archbishop of Buenos Aires in 2010. Regarding the proposed redefinition of civil marriage in Argentina, then-Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio wrote on June 22, 2010, “The Argentine people must face, in the next few weeks, a situation whose result may gravely harm the family. It is the bill on matrimony of persons of the same sex. The identity of the family, and its survival, are in jeopardy here: father, mother, and children. The life of so many children who will be discriminated beforehand due to the lack of human maturity that God willed them to have with a father and a mother is in jeopardy. A clear rejection of the law of God, engraved in our hearts, is in jeopardy. . . . Let us not be naive: it is not a simple political struggle; it is an intention [which is] destructive of the plan of God. It is not a mere legislative project (this is a mere instrument), but rather a ‘move’ of the father of lies who wishes to confuse and deceive the children of God.”8


The Pope’s reference to the “father of lies” comes from the Gospel of John (8:44), where Jesus refers to the devil as “a liar and the father of lies.” So Pope Francis is saying that same-sex “marriage” comes from the devil and should be condemned as such.


Another major deception or distortion of marriage is the view that it is not ultimately about generating life, but rather is mainly about a romantic relationship designed for individual (not even mutual) fulfillment. That distorted understanding cuts across opposite-sex marriage and same-sex marriage proponents in our culture. We are all summoned to reflect more deeply on the truth of marriage.


It is also a deception to say that there will be no adverse effects on children being brought up in the household of a same-sex couple.9


The division brought about by the Devil due to same-sex marriage may be seen in the way our society, our families and our friendships have become so divided and polarized over this issue.

The diversion of the Devil in same-sex marriage may be seen in the fact that so much of our time, energy and resources are being spent in addressing this issue, when there are more pressing needs facing our state and our Church.

The work of discouragement by the Devil in same-sex marriage is apparent in the message being conveyed to defenders of traditional marriage that the universal redefinition of marriage is unstoppable, so we might as well just stop trying. But the legalization of abortion on demand forty years ago did not silence those who believe that abortion is contrary to God’s law. On the contrary, Roe v. Wade only heightened the need for more concerted efforts to protect all human life from conception to natural death. So, too, the legal redefinition of civil marriage does not put an end to the need for discourse and action to defend natural marriage in accord with God’s plan, but only serves to heighten the need for greater efforts in this regard.

The Prayers for “Supplication and Exorcism Which May Be Used in Particular Circumstances of the Church” are taken from the Appendices to the 2004 Latin edition of the Rite of Exorcism, the introduction to which explains, “The presence of the Devil and other demons appears and exists not only in the tempting or tormenting of persons, but also in the penetration of things and places in a certain manner by their activity, and in various forms of opposition to and persecution of the Church. If the Diocesan Bishop, in particular situations, judges it appropriate to announce gatherings of the faithful for prayer, under the leadership and direction of a Priest, elements for arranging a rite of supplication may be taken from [the texts provided in these appendices].”

Same-sex marriage is contrary to the plan of God, as described in the Bible, when Jesus cites the Book of Genesis in asking the Pharisees, “Have you not read that at the beginning the Creator made them male and female and declared, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and cling to his wife, and the two shall become as one?’ Thus they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore, let no man separate what God has joined.”10

Since the legal redefinition of marriage is contrary to God’s plan, those who contract civil same-sex marriage are culpable of serious sin. Politicians responsible for enacting civil same-sex marriage legislation are morally complicit as co-operators in facilitating this grave sin. We must pray for forgiveness of these sins and deliverance from this evil which has penetrated our state and our Church. The Church stands ready to extend God’s mercy to those who confess their sins with true repentance and a firm purpose of amendment in the Sacrament of Reconciliation.11

We must also affirm the teaching of the Catholic Church that homosexual persons “must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.”12 The Church loves homosexual persons and looks upon them with compassion, offering assistance through support groups such as the Courage Apostolate to live in accord with the virtue of chastity.13 Indeed, all people all called to chastity, which for a man and woman united in matrimony means for the husband and wife to be faithful to each other.

In conclusion, I quote from a homily given in the second century: “Let me say also that when we are given a warning and corrected for doing something wrong, we should not be so foolish as to take offense and be angry. There are times when we are unconscious of the sins we commit because our hearts are fickle, lacking in faith. Futile desires becloud our minds. We need to pull ourselves up, therefore, because our very salvation is at stake. Those who keep God’s commandments will have reason to rejoice. For a short time in this world they may have to suffer, but they will rise again and their reward will endure for ever. No one who holds God in reverence should grieve over the hardships of this present time, for a time of blessedness awaits him. He will live again in heaven in the company of all those who have gone before him; for all eternity he will rejoice, never to know sorrow again.”14 


May God give us this grace. Amen.





NOTES
1            Gospel of St. Matthew 18:15: “If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault.”
2            http://www.americamagazine.org/pope-interview.
3            http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/20130919_1.htm.
4        http://voices.suntimes.com/early-and-often/politics/calling-calvin-kleinwhat-to-wear-to-an-exorcism/.
5     From a sermon by Saint Leo the Great, Pope, Liturgy of the Hours, Office of
Readings for the Memorial of the Dedication of the Baslicas of Saints Peter and Paul.
6        http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=178&GAID=10&Doc TypeID=HB&LegId=40195&SessionID=76. 
7            Father Louis J. Cameli, The Devil You Don’t Know: Recognizing and Resisting Evil in Everyday Life (Notre Dame, Indiana: Ave Maria Press, 2011.
8            http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2013/03/letter-of-cardinal-bergoglio-to.html.
9            See the New Family Structures Study of the University of Texas, 2011, http://www.familystructurestudies.com/.
10        Matthew 19:4-6, citing Genesis 1:27 and 2:24; cf. Mark 10:6-9.
11        Pope John Paul II, “Confession must be Humble, Complete, and Accompanied by a Firm Purpose of Amendment,” letter to Cardinal William W. Baum, Major Penitentiary, dated March 22, 1996, published in L'Osservatore Romano, Weekly Edition in English, April 10 1996, available online at:  http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/JP960322.HTM. 
12        Catechism of the Catholic Church, #2358.
13        http://www.couragerc.net/. 
14        From a homily written in the second century, Liturgy of the Hours, Office of
Readings, Saturday of the Thirty-Second Week i

Back to the Basics - God is Love! (video)

Here is a fantastic video talking about the "big picture", that God is Love and how Pope Francis isn't changing Church teaching, He's just asking us to see the underlying principles (LOVE).  I know I posted about this before, but this video quickly and easily gets to the heart of the matter (without me spending hours banging away on the keyboard - I'm doing that enough right now anyway... Enjoy!


Pope Francis's Interview - Be Christlike in Everything (hint: love)

When the days for Jesus to be taken up were fulfilled, he resolutely determined to journey to Jerusalem, and he sent messengers ahead of him. On the way they entered a Samaritan village to prepare for his reception there, but they would not welcome him because the destination of his journey was Jerusalem. When the disciples James and John saw this they asked, “Lord, do you want us to call down fire from heaven to consume them?” Jesus turned and rebuked them, and they journeyed to another village. - Luke 9:51-56
For whatever reason, I was particularly attentive during Mass the other day, and this Gospel really jumped out at me.  The story is familiar: a village doesn't welcome Jesus, and James and John want to call down fire from heaven to destroy the city, just nuke 'em, as Fr. Tom summarized in his homily.  But, instead of being angry at the village, Jesus just goes to another village, rebuking his disciples at their desire for vengeance.

Obviously, there is a lot going on in our world today (the government shutdown comes to mind), but something that has been making waves in Catholic circles is the recent interview given by Pope Francis.  Of course, since I started this post Pope Francis has given a 2nd interview, but I won't go into that one...  Basically, the press (for the most part) has leaped upon this interview saying that the church's policies on issues that is has formerly been staunchly against (abortion, "gay" marriage, contraception) have changed.  Sorry to break the news to the modern world, but they haven't, and they won't.  Actually, listen to what Pope Francis says:
“We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods. This is not possible. I have not spoken much about these things, and I was reprimanded for that. But when we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context. The teaching of the church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of the church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time."
What is he saying?:  We can't focus only on hot-button ethical and moral issues.  Yes, they are important, but if that is all you talk about nobody will listen.  His reason isn't to say that these issues aren't important but that, "when we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context."  What's the context?:  Jesus' redemptive, loving, death in order to bring us God's love (and life).  "Love".  It's a word that people have watered down in our culture.  Dictionary.com says that love is:

love

  [luhv]  Show IPA noun, verb, loved, lov·ing.
noun
1.
a profoundly tender, passionate affection for another person.
2.
a feeling of warm personal attachment or deep affection, as for a parent, child, or friend.
3.
sexual passion or desire.
4.
a person toward whom love is felt; beloved person; sweetheart.
5.
(used in direct address as a term of endearment, affection, or the like): Would you like to see a movie, love?

Love, in Christianity, is so much more than just affection!  Love is a supernatural virtue that comes from God.  Love, is the "fire" that Jesus wants to inflame us with (that is why this post started with that Gospel).  It is the fire that we should be praying would fall from heaven upon us.  As Jesus says "I have come to cast fire upon the earth; and would that it were already kindled!" - Luke 12:49  Listen to Pope Francis as he continues:
"The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently. Proclamation in a missionary style focuses on the essentials, on the necessary things: this is also what fascinates and attracts more, what makes the heart burn, as it did for the disciples at Emmaus. We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel. The proposal of the Gospel must be more simple, profound, radiant. It is from this proposition that the moral consequences then flow."
The last line of this statement is the key! "It is from this proposition that the moral consequences then flow."  The moral teachings of the church aren't subjective, or changing, precisely because they come from  Jesus Christ's teachings and life.  The pope, or the bishops, or whoever, don't just make up moral principles for us to follow.  The Church was guaranteed by Christ to teach the Truth!  Jesus says "I am with you always, to the close of the age." - Matthew 28:20  He says to Peter "you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.  I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." - Matthew 16:18-19  Finally, to Pilate's question "what is truth" we find Jesus' answer "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me." - John 14:6


When Jesus says that "I" will be with you always, He is telling His apostles that Truth itself will be with them always.  When Jesus gives His authority to Peter, He is giving him the authority to speak the truth on Christ's behalf.  The Church is the way that Jesus chose to send His message into the world.  

Alright, this post is getting long, but the points must be pulled together.  What Pope Francis is telling the world (and everybody in the Church) is that the foundations of our moral teaching must be Christ, who is love.  But proclaiming the message of the Gospel (love) isn't the kind of love that the world subscribes to.  Our foundation cannot be the hollow, warm-and-fuzzy "luv" that the world lives by, but must be the love that comes from Christ.  We shouldn't always bang away at certain moral issues precisely because Christ did not.  

We have to remember that Jesus Christ, God Incarnate, walked on our earth - yeah, it was 2000 years ago, but people struggled with the same sins that we do today.  Certainly the world has changed, but human concupiscence has not.  Thus, though Jesus did preach against many, many sins of his day (Read what comes after the Beatitudes), at the same time He showed mercy to sinners of every kind and all the time.  This is what Pope Francis is calling for, not a relaxing of the Church's stance on important moral issues (they can't change!), but a reassessment of what and how we talk with others - is it out of love, or do we just keep forcing moral statutes down their throat?  Do we forget the Great Commandment (love God and love neighbor) in correcting our neighbor on less foundational moral principles?  Pope Francis's stance of love  doesn't undermine the moral statutes of the Church, it is their foundation.  Love is the reason behind the Church's teaching on contraception, abortion, "gay" marriage, and euthanasia.  This means on the one hand that they can't change (God is Love), but it also means that love must permeate everything we do, including how we spread the moral teaching of the Church.

Thanks for reading that whole post guys!  Actually, I was at first kind of worried about Pope Francis's comments, but when you actually read what he said, and flesh out the reasoning behind it, you find that He is doing exactly what Christ did.  Want more on this topic?  Check out Fr. Barron's comments: